Larimer County Board of County Commissioners - Administrative Matters 7/9/24
by Lee Thielen
For more information (including members in attendance) see the full notes document here.*
View the meeting agenda and packet.
When available, a video recording of the meeting will be on the Larimer County Government YouTube channel.
From the Board of Commissioners website: “Larimer's three-member Board of County Commissioners is the main policy-making body in the County and works to represent the interest of the citizens of Larimer County at local, state and national levels. Commissioners are elected at large from one of three geographic districts for four-year staggered terms. In Larimer County, Commissioners are limited to serving three four-year terms.”
Highlights
The Commissioners voted to provide legal support for two cases: Jordan Rich vs John Feyen and Dustin Bartles vs Larimer County Sheriff’s Office.
After the Pledge of Allegiance, the Commissioners opened for public comment. There was none.
After approval of the minutes of the previous meeting and a review of next week’s meetings, Commissioner Stephens reviewed the Consent Agenda which was unanimously approved.
The Consent Agenda included:
- Three abatement decisions,
- A development agreement for Monty Subdivision,
- Several liquor licenses, and
- Appointments of Michelle Wilcox to the Fair Board; and David Roecker, Luke Margheim, Hope Hartman, and Joshua Alvarez to the Workforce Development Board.
- The commissioners also supported a 2025 legislative proposal through Colorado Counties Inc. regarding agricultural land in urban renewal authorities.
The meeting transitioned to an Executive Session at 9:23 a.m. to discuss and decide a legal matter. When the meeting resumed, the commissioners voted to support legal services regarding U. S. District Court Case Joran Rich vs John Feyen, et al and U. S. District Court Case Dustin Bartles v. Larimer County Sheriff’s Office, et al.
Next Meeting: July 16, 2024, 9 a.m. at 200 West Oak, Ste. 2200 80521 or live streamed.
*Citizen Observers further the commitment of the League of Women Voters to its principle of Citizens Right to Know, however, we are not acting as journalists. Omissions and errors are possible. It is assumed that users of this information are responsible for their own fact-checking. This could include contacting a government clerk, conversing with an elected official or staff, and/or asking us to speak to the Observer who attended.